{"id":277,"date":"2017-03-14T20:10:17","date_gmt":"2017-03-14T20:10:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/jsr.isrt.ac.bd\/?post_type=article&p=277"},"modified":"2017-03-14T20:10:17","modified_gmt":"2017-03-14T20:10:17","slug":"analysis-error-contaminated-survival-data-proportional-odds-model","status":"publish","type":"article","link":"http:\/\/jsr.isrt.ac.bd\/article\/analysis-error-contaminated-survival-data-proportional-odds-model\/","title":{"rendered":"Analysis of error-contaminated survival data under the proportional odds model"},"content":{"rendered":"
There has been extensive research interest in analysis of survival data with covariates subject
\nto measurement error. The focus of the most discussions is on the proportional hazards
\n(PH) model, although there are some work concerning the accelerated failure time (AFT)
\nmodel and the additive hazards (AH) model. Relatively little attention has been directed to
\nstudying the impact of measurement error on other models, such as the proportional odds
\n(PO) model. The proportional odds model is an important alternative when PH, AFT or
\nAH models are not appropriate to fit data. In this paper we discuss two inference methods
\nto accommodate measurement error effects under the PO model, in contrast to the naive
\nanalysis that ignores the covariate measurement error. Numerical studies are conducted to
\nevaluate the performance of the proposed methods.<\/p>\n