{"id":536,"date":"2017-09-24T07:03:08","date_gmt":"2017-09-24T07:03:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/jsr.isrt.ac.bd\/?post_type=article&p=536"},"modified":"2017-09-24T07:03:20","modified_gmt":"2017-09-24T07:03:20","slug":"estimating-proportion-explained-variation-underlying-linear-model-using-logistic-regression-analysis","status":"publish","type":"article","link":"http:\/\/jsr.isrt.ac.bd\/article\/estimating-proportion-explained-variation-underlying-linear-model-using-logistic-regression-analysis\/","title":{"rendered":"Estimating proportion of explained variation for an underlying linear model using logistic regression analysis"},"content":{"rendered":"
Eight type statistics proposed to use in logistics regression analysis are evaluated
\nbased upon their ability to predict the proportion of explained variation
\n() for an underlying linear model with latent scale continuous dependent variable.
\nFunctional relationships between these statistics are also studied. Predictive
\nquality of these statistics depends mainly upon the proportion of success in the
\nsample and , the quantity to be predicted. We found
\n(Hagle and Mitchell (1992)) to be numerically closest to the underlying . There is a one-to-one
\ncorrespondence between the likelihood based statistics, some of which have
\nbeen considered independent until recently.<\/p>\n